[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Inline CO2 Reactors.
Okay, so some alternatives: Rocks and pebbles tend to have
too little space between them and don't slough excess
biofilm as well as the plastic used for bioballs. I have
reactors with bioballs and clean them maybe once every two
years for the heck of it, not because the flow slows down.
I don't openthem up, I jsut attach them to a hose and force
some storng water flow through them. There tubes happen to
be clear. I have one about 4 years old that Tom Barr made
that has never been cleaned and has never faultered in
performance. Thanks, Tom!
There are screw-cap fittigs that can be used insted of just
gluing on end caps -- there used to be someone on Ebay that
sold reactors like that -- and McMaster-Carr (mcmaster.com)
has just about every plastic fitting, barbed and otherwise,
that you can think of.
--- Chris Hotte <ecwh at cogeco_ca> wrote:
> S. Hieber wrote:
> >An alternative -- mind you I didn't say the only one --
> >to get the CO2 equipment out of the tank -- a mixing
> >chamber (or what the at-a-loss-for-small-words folks
> call a
> >*REACTOR*) can be made for a few bucks and a little time
> >and not much dexterity is required:
> >Btw, neither Dave nor Hudson nor I make a penny on these
> >and I didn't design the things or make the pictures and
> >not even connected with the website -- I only bring them
> >because they're inexpensive, 100% efficient, out of the
> >tank, and easy to make.
> I made something like similar based on that
> instructional. I could only
> find barb connectors that have had a 90o angle. It works,
> however it's a
> pain in the ass to clean since I sealed it with the
> exception of the
> barbed fittings. It also doesn't disconnect very nicely
> and usually
> ends up in a mess. Instead of BioBalls, I used large
> inert granite
> pebbles I had lying around. I used it for around 6 months
> and then grew
> tired of it slowing down the little flow I had. I'm lazy
> about cleaning
> my canister filter, so I didn't need the extra drag
> inline after a
> couple months of buildup. I removed the stupid thing and
> now feed CO2
> directly into in a powerhead I pulled out of retirement.
> It works fine.
> The bubble rate is now 0.33/second vs 0.14/second with
> the reactor. My
> 5lb tank still lasts 'forever'. The guy at the welding
> shop has only
> seen me once for a refill since I got this setup from him
> around this
> time last year. I absolutely blew his mind with the slow
> controlled rate
> I was trying to achieve. He'd never heard of anything
> like this
> application, however that isn't surprising at a welding
> supplier. My
> tank would have lasted longer if I hadn't decided to dump
> it when the
> guage was reading 800psi, down from the regular 900psi.
> That was fun. I
> did it to avoid "tank dump" but there was alot more gas
> in there than I
> had expected and I likely will not do that again.
> CO2 is cheap and well... I think the inline reactor is a
> nice project
> and all, but necessary if some other reaction method is
> available, even
> if not as efficient. It's still nowhere near the
> inconvenience of using
> the yeast/sugar method. I'll stop keeping aquatic plants
> before I go
> back to that.
> Anyone want my PVC inline C02 reactor? I still haven't
> tossed it. Free,
> but you pay shipping -- It's full of rocks. ;-)
> - Chris.
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
author of the best current authoritative text on aquatic plants
will be a featured speaker at
The Northeast Council of Aquarium Societies 30th Annual Convention.
March 18-20, 2005 at the Marriott Hotel, Farmington, CT
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com