[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:**Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com****Subject**:**Re: The chilling truth about cold horsepower****From**:**stevecj at mail_utexas.edu**- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:41:02 -0500
- In-reply-to: <200306101056.h5AAu8Gr019632@otter.actwin.com>
- References: <200306101056.h5AAu8Gr019632@otter.actwin.com>
- User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2-cvs

Hi all, Been lurking for a while, and thought I might try my hand at posting. Scott H said: >For example a 610 watt air conditioner is rated for 6000 >BTU/hr cooling capacity. 610 watts=2077 BTU/hr yields 6000 >BTU/hr cooling capacity. Does this not seem odd? >There is something I am obviously missing here, but I'll be >darned if I can figure it out, so far. I'm checking this >further. I'll let you know what I find out. There is another term you might want to consider called the "Coefficient of Performance" (or COP). COP is used as a measure of efficiency of a refrigeration system. It is defined as the cooling ability of the system over the power input to the system. Because refrigerators, chillers, and air conditioners only move heat from one location to another it is possible to move an amount of thermal energy that is greater than the amount of work the pump or motor puts into the system. It turns out that for air conditioners, typical values for the COP are somewhere around 2-3 or so (as memory serves). So, in your example above, the COP of the system would be (6000 BTU cooling)/ (2077 BTU power input) = 2.89. As I recall, a COP in this range is not atypical. Hope this helps. Steve

- Prev by Date:
**Mail Order Plants** - Next by Date:
**Re: chillers** - Previous by thread:
**Re: The chilling truth about cold horsepower** - Next by thread:
**Re: The chilling truth about cold horsepower** - Index(es):