[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dealing with the real fish? problem
This is a bit heated, and exactly what I'd like toa void.
As an atheist, though, I have to yet argue with your statement on the
inability to quantify creationalism. It is as quantifiable as any other
theory/idea/belief/whatever you choose to call it.
Lets watch the flames, and try to keep this friendly
><>
J. L. Wiegert NFC at actwin_com List Admin
Come Chat at SomeThing Fishy To join: Send e-mail to
Telnet to: nfc-request at actwin_com with
Nexus.V-Wave.Com, port 7000 the command 'subscribe' in
the body. To leave, use
www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/2308 'unsubscribe'.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dubotchugh yIpummoH. bI'IQchugh Yivang!
On Sun, 28 Jun 1998 Moontanman at aol_com wrote:
> I'll still try to be nice, creationism is not science, it has no way of being
> put to the test it is simply a belief. Evolution is science, it can be
> tested, it can quantified, and it does describe the way nature works
> accurately. If you want to believe in something that is your right, but don't
> try to cloak it in pseudo science to make it look respectable. If you are
> really a creationist why do you worry about pollution, and other environmental
> problems, God can fix it all with just a thought and you can get a new game.
>
>
> Michael
>
References: