[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] Sscience



So sorry... I was not referring to you as the hijacker. That distinction 
goes to jerry baker.

</aa>

...... Original Message .......
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:54:18 -0500 (EST) urville <urville at peoplepc_com> 
wrote:
>i certainly never intended a hijacking. my apologies to anyone who thinks 
so.
>but in three days there will be another one of these. I read very little 
here I either havent seen somewhere else discussed a great length, or is at 
all new. long before i got involved
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Aronson <adam at aronson_net>
>Sent: Nov 3, 2005 2:31 PM
>To: 'aquatic plants digest' <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
>Subject: Re: [APD] Sscience
>
>Ditto, Vaughn. Well said. Whenever a list is hijacked by someone (usually
>people who like to argue) most of us tune out until they (or he) runs out 
of
>steam. Hopefully we are not too far from that point now.
>
>Adam
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: aquatic-plants-bounces at actwin_com 
>> [mailto:aquatic-plants-bounces at actwin_com] On Behalf Of Vaughn Hopkins
>> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:33 AM
>> To: aquatic plants digest
>> Subject: Re: [APD] Sscience
>> 
>> There are many things we could discuss here, or argue about 
>> here, but it just isn't appropriate.  This is an aquatic 
>> plant discussion list, not a general discussion list.  I have 
>> no problem with off topic things being discussed 
>> occasionally, but when those discussions go on and on and on 
>> I do object.  Surely we all know that we could debate things 
>> like religion, politics, PETA, abortion, Iraq, etc. forever, 
>> but it just isn't appropriate to do so here.  There are many 
>> blogs, for example, where such discussions are appropriate.  
>> Please, let's not destroy this group.
>> 
>> Vaughn H.
>> 
>> On Thursday, November 3, 2005, at 08:12 AM, Jerry Baker wrote:
>> 
>> > Bill D wrote:
>> >> Jerry, this is exactly the kind of ad hominem attack that 
>> you use all 
>> >> too
>> >> frequently.   It is the antithesis of scientific 
>> discusssion.  If you 
>> >> are
>> >> trying to make a point, that stuff gets in the way of it, 
>> but if you 
>> >> just want attention, it is effective, at least for a 
>> while.  But it 
>> >> gets tiring.
>> >
>> > So are you suggesting that since that has been my life experience - 
>> > that is exactly the kind of stuff I heard in Sunday school 
>> - I cannot 
>> > relate that to the list because my experiences might offend someone 
>> > else?
>> > That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jerry Baker
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aquatic-Plants mailing list
>> > Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
>> > http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
>> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
>> http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
>> 
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Aquatic-Plants mailing list
>Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
>
>
>________________________________________
>PeoplePC Online
>A better way to Internet
>http://www.peoplepc.com
>_______________________________________________
>Aquatic-Plants mailing list
>Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
>


_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants