[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual

To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
From: Jerry Baker <jerry at bakerweb_biz>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:43:25 -0700
In-reply-to: <750fa0890509231428762e2331@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.11920.1127446834.14347.aquatic-plants@actwin.com> <007801c5c07e$1b6d7e20$07325144@hsd1.pa.comcast.net> <43346D10.2090605@bakerweb.biz> <750fa0890509231428762e2331@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (Windows/20050920)

Liz Wilhite wrote:
>  The whole point that most everyone else has been trying to make is that it
> is not the data that is at issue, it's the interpretation.

The interpretation comes from the data. Ever heard of GIGO (Garbage In, 
Garbage Out)? Noisy data means a noisy result.

-- 
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
  - From: Liz Wilhite
- Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
  - From: Derek Parr

References:
- Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
  - From: Bill D
- Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
  - From: Jerry Baker
- Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
  - From: Liz Wilhite

Prev by Date: Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
Next by Date: Re: [APD] CO2 purity
Previous by thread: Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
Next by thread: Re: [APD] Theory vs. Actual
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread