[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blower Vs. Compressor
- To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com (Aquatic-Plants)
- Subject: Re: Blower Vs. Compressor
- From: "David W. Webb" <dwebb at ti_com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 15:16:49 -0500
- Conversation-Id: <BMSMTP86433188167a0206807 at dsks52_itg.ti.com>
>Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 05:38:06 -0500
>From: "David Jones" <pommie at concentric_net>
>I am busy setting up a nursery for aquatic plants and have been collecting
>catalogs from all kinds of suppliers that might have relevant equipment
>I have found most of the catalogs relating to commercial scale fish
>breeding offer blowers rather than the air compressor that I had been
>looking forward to buying.
>I realize that I dont need 90 PSI. but was fondly anticipating a
>collection of pneumatic tools after going to the expense of acquiring a
>Does any one have suggestions as to why blowers predominate the aquatic
>industry, the cost seems about the same so that appears not to be the
I know of one possibility that has so far kept me from looking into using a
regular air compressor in fishroom designs.
Piston air compressors require oil for lubrication, and that oil does find
its way into the compressed air and regulator. I've seen a number of
compressors that have liquid traps in-line coming off of the regulator, and
I suspect that these would work to an extent, but I'm not sure about
blowing petroleum vapors through the tanks. Otherwise, a
compressor/regulator hooked up to the air-handler for a fishroom would be a
nice way to have air even when the power goes off for a while.
David W. Webb in humid Plano, TX.