[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Icecap MH ballast

To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Subject: Re: Icecap MH ballast
From: Craig Bingman <cbingman at netcom_com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:09:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <199703180839.DAA01094 at looney_actwin.com>

> From: spushak at CCGATE_HAC.COM
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 97 19:31:37 PST8
> Subject: Re: Icecap MH ballast
> 
>      Any chance of 250 watt MH ballasts?

I don't think so.  My understanding was that they were going to do a 400 
watt ballast next, which is a good move, IMO, especially if they keep the 
price similar to the ballast for a 175.

At the same price, payback should be in half the time, again, neglecting 
effect on lamp life.

Craig

Prev by Date: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V2 #585
Next by Date: Re:DIY CO2 reactor
Prev by thread: Re: Icecap MH ballast
Next by thread: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V2 #584
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread