Re: [APD] Plantless Aquascapes

[carlo <wet at petalphile_com>]

Re: bristlenose - agreed. Lots of folks migrate fish between tanks though,
no?

But this does not negate a wonderful hardscape, does it?  With
algaecide/excel/capping the substrate/scrubbing the hardscape and with
regular plantless maintenance, how is the maturity of the tank relevant?

Isn't this the appeal of a non-planted, light-for-fish-only tank?


(Original message got lost on the internets.)



On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Stuart Halliday <stuart at mytriops_com>wrote:

> On 16/08/2011 20:20, carlo wrote:
>
>> I think water is necessary for an "aquascape" vs a "landscape."
>>
>> You may have seen this wonderful plantless (but with fish) tank from ADG.
>>  I
>> think this is still totally an aquascape without the fish:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=E5-1_uTPTxo<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5-1_uTPTxo>
>>
>
> Can't see that albino bristlenose surviving long in that tiny tank....
>
> As usual, these display tanks are never kept up for more than a couple of
> months.
>
>
>
> --
> Stuart Halliday
> http://mytriops.com/
> 200 Million years in the making...
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> http://mailman.actwin.com/**mailman/listinfo/aquatic-**plants<http://mailman.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>
>
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://mailman.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants