[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] The non-aquatic plant issue (Nick Andrews)
- To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
- Subject: Re: [APD] The non-aquatic plant issue (Nick Andrews)
- From: "B. T. Forsythe" <megasycophant at gmail_com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:14:00 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g2Kk4jdNNgvrYHB9bEi/aBjQT3mRQ2kvwEmLD57FQnU=; b=EOq4rkg/x75vDalTw4h64fo9A2eXQrcw6V0BJyxGDRwUwG8ctxCsXwvfi9eKvPAQ68 RH0lwARhdt0IUT571jnXf3vVm7ZSTNA/+P9x6q7R6B3y9OE+Yz+9hw0V5FTEyhMlUAE/ U6q8iI4mNTY7/ohkkFPREnUi6WTl2P43CBD7Y=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rrqY+kLpzP/jlMDKJ0guU/HiYDKX4SJsD2zO1UsJhB3RxjoXmz8GjuVqs8qpdnZvq2 h+VNd+30kW26nwtQwvQdxxf04vvCTkbTNvFOyREl5Xu828JzLABkF3r0rhnWQgtSWFjT H9YqrvX7XMm/DTgXAtPQHqvLxg0I0sjWnS098=
- In-reply-to: <4B6D5C4C_5060705 at mytriops.com>
- List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
- List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
- List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.actwin.com/mailman/options/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <EE3A1AFB71A1E54BA3D302718EA382F9159621 at server1_WaveformTechnology.local> <4B6C9120_7000407 at mytriops.com> <bd1652dc1002051611q5ce7a5cj20dcc0877e8d5f38 at mail_gmail.com> <4B6D5C4C_5060705 at mytriops.com>
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Stuart Halliday <stuart at mytriops_com> wrote:
> I believe B. T. Forsythe wrote this email section below:
>
>
> A troubling thing about all of this is that the only organization with any
>> clout of which I'm aware that purports to defend the rights of these
>> animals, aquatic or avian, is PETA, and they are the flip side of the coin,
>> answering ignorant nonchalance with ignorant advocacy.
>>
>
>
> No, not the only one. The RSPCA, the RSPB and the SSPCA all have the power
> to prosecute people and no doubt there are a lot more organisations in the
> world.
Sorry, I was unclear. What I should have said was that the only aquarium
fish advocacy material I've seen is from PETA. Their general message boils
down it being cruel and unusual to keep them at all, since they're happier
in nature.
Does anyone know of any groups that advocate and try to make an impact on
the pet fish industry?
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://mailman.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants