[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Animal Mutilation
Bill wrote:
> On the other hand, there is no disagreement that cutting out an animal's sex
> organs reduces or eliminates the amount of sex hormones in that animal. Are
> you saying that sex hormones serve no purpose if the animal is not to
> reproduce?
I am saying that the harm is outweighed by the prevention of killings to
follow were the procedure not to take place. It's not an ideal solution,
but rarely is anything. I don't believe that removing tails or ears has
a benefit that outweighs the potential harm. I agree that it's nearly
impossible to know what another animal is experiencing. I just want to
err on the safe side and assume that what hurts us hurts them. If I'm
wrong, no harm done. If I choose to assume that other animals cannot
feel pain to the degree that we do, and that turns out to be incorrect,
that could be a tragedy. It's a modified version of Pascal's Wager if
you will.
I'm not sure I'd go as far as banning the practice, but I'm on the fence.
--
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants