[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] LED Technology. And now back to CF

To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: [APD] LED Technology. And now back to CF
From: Chris Hotte <ecwh73 at gmail_com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:38:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <839442.79548.qm@web30812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <839442.79548.qm@web30812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

S. Hieber wrote:
> The underlying UV wouldn't be visible to humans. The diff is that the diff phosphors in the flo 
I know how they work. I was saying it's possible escaping UV fluoresces 
what it hits. But... it's more likely the phosphor is narrow as you say 
at the wrong freq.

- C

_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

References:
- Re: [APD] LED Technology. And now back to CF
  - From: S. Hieber

Prev by Date: Re: [APD] Reactive Ballast
Next by Date: Re: [APD] Reactive Ballast
Previous by thread: Re: [APD] LED Technology. And now back to CF
Next by thread: Re: [APD] LED Technology. And now back to CF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread