Re: [APD] Aquatic-Plants Digest, Vol 37, Issue 36

[Thomas Barr <tcbiii at yahoo_com>]

> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber at yahoo_com>
> Subject: Re: [APD] Conductivity
> To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
 
> Why? Easy. The outcome is underdetermined by the facts in the
> case presented.

No, they are there.
Why would each case occur?

You do not need a set of pre existing information/facts in this
question to solve it.

There are 3 possible outcomes and possible (more if you are
wise, see DL's second question about CO2 above) responses to why
and justifications for each.
 
Simple question really:)
Not quite so simple answer.

Regards, 
Tom Barr


www.BarrReport.com
Public forums now open!! Have a local club banner? Send it! we
will place it in rotation!!




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants