Re: [APD] PMDD AND PHOSPHATE LIMITATION STRATEGY

[Vaughn Hopkins <hoppycalif at yahoo_com>]

Kids!  Go to your room!


On Sunday, March 19, 2006, at 01:59 PM, Jerry Baker wrote:

> Charley Bay wrote:
>>   You want to force universal
>>   acceptance of just one thought for that term?
>>   Ain't gonna happen.
>
> Nope. Actually read the thread instead of reading the subject lines or
> the first few sentences.
>
>> * The original banter was from when you kept
>>   referring to it as a "micro-" nutrient mix, with
>>   another person correcting that "macro-" nutrients
>>   were a significant part.  Yet, you just wouldn't
>>   concede that point.  (Ditto when others mention
>>   inconsistencies in your position.)
>
> You are twisting the situation to embelish your point. The argument was
> not about referring to a particular mix of ingredients as PMDD, it was
> over whether you could refer to the entire strategy of limiting
> phosphates as PMDD. It started because someone mentioned using PMDD and
> another person jumped in and said that phosphate limitation had been
> proven ineffective. My point was that PMDD and the theory of limiting
> phosphates were two different things.
>
>> * Don't be a jerk.  For this discussion, I'll
>>   define that as harassing or belittling until
>>   people don't want to post anymore, or better yet,
>>   until they regret posting in the first place.
>
> Is the irony intentional?
>
> If you don't like a particular conversation, I don't know why you can't
> just keep quiet. That's usually the polite way to behave. I didn't say
> one negative thing to anyone. Only you are doing that.
>
> -- 
> Jerry Baker
> _______________________________________________
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
>

_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants