[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] 75 vs 90

To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: [APD] 75 vs 90
From: Russell Vance <russell_vance at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:42:16 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tqDfK58NhwzlDSTdhuB+A6Il/rH8XGjM1oXgF/C4EYY8FTqSJNYQxt8lW33HwXuOOaivADOWGYox+YAEJrZyn1rpfYkzzfFW0HX2YPjuOvJGhuKjECEYRKa4eSoU030cYm5kNooYRc+jP97PdwVdAJW5pyqeP3AotysrRIg32Gk=
In-reply-to: <283.42f30ea.310132b5@aol.com>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <283.42f30ea.310132b5@aol.com>

I would agree with Rich and go with the 90.  An extra few inches isn't going
to cause major lighting or pruning problems. Just pull out a stool to stand
on if you must, but I would always like more water volume. Also, there are
lots of tall plants that are a pain in shorter tanks.
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

References:
- Re: [APD] 75 vs 90
  - From: RMGTBTS

Prev by Date: Re: [APD] 75 vs 90
Next by Date: Re: [APD] Tank Size Question
Previous by thread: Re: [APD] 75 vs 90
Next by thread: [APD] synchronized fishy swimming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread