[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Soil master black/charcoal in Sacramento
Vaughn Hopkins wrote:
> It is all a matter of taste, or esthetics. Obviously, there are very,
> very few natural water sites in the world with fluorescent blue
> substrates. But, black is not terribly common either. The Soilmaster
> stuff, the charcoal version is a dark grey color, which I suppose is
> natural - like black mud. I happen to really like the appearance of
> near black substrates because of the pleasant, to me, contrast with the
> green and reddish plants, and the fish. But, that is the only reason I
> strongly prefer a near black color. Those who prefer a bright orange
> color aren't wrong, or unnatural, just color blind!
> Vaughn H.
I had just been under the impression that the objections to colored
gravel were based on its unnatural coloration. I hadn't considered that
it might be purely due to aesthetics. I suppose I was projecting the
reasons for my objection to colored gravel onto others. I was wondering
why black was so revered. I am odd in that I do like the look of black,
but I could never have it because I would feel just as wrong as if I had
used electric blue gravel (even if it did look good). I guess I'm one of
those purists you hear about occasionally ;)
I even had to modify my substrate choices based on my research of what
the typical coloration of Amazonian river substrates were. I don't like
very light colored substrates, but that's what most of the small
soft-water streams there seem to have. If I want an Amazonian biotope
that seems to be what I have to have.
--
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants