[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] assumptions

To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: [APD] assumptions
From: Jerry Baker <jerry at bakerweb_biz>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:08:25 -0800
In-reply-to: <001101c5e567$49452e70$6501a8c0@jimscomputer>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <001101c5e567$49452e70$6501a8c0@jimscomputer>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (Windows/20051108)

Jim Swinford wrote:
> The argument(differance of opinion?) is not whether there is diffusion but the rates, types and causes of diffusion.

That is exactly what I have been trying to say. We know there is 
diffusion, but we do not know the extent of it.

-- 
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

References:
- [APD] assumptions
  - From: Jim Swinford

Prev by Date: [APD] assumptions
Next by Date: Re: [APD] On the subject of snails....
Previous by thread: [APD] assumptions
Next by thread: [APD] Assumptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread