Re: [APD] CO2 in the mist

["Mariano F. Bonfante" <mariano_bonfante at hotmail_com>]

Ok, that?s clear. But what should be the benefit of a sinterized reactor vs. 
a canister filter input?.


>From: urville <urville at peoplepc_com>
>Reply-To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
>To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
>Subject: Re: [APD] CO2 in the mist
>Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 23:06:04 -0600
>
>well i use diy keep that in mind. but when my yeast was producing about
>2 or 3 bubbles a second  steady and it was hooked to my powerheads
>venturi i was getting about 30ppm or so. i just lay it at an angled loop
>so it doesnt suck everything out of the bottle. but when i put it into
>my fluval 204 at the same bubble rate, i got big burps of bubbles every
>10 minutes in addition to tiny bubble all the time. and my ppm was around 
>79
>
>Mariano F. Bonfante wrote:
>
> >I get lost in this point, please help me. I have the CO2 line into a 
>Fluval
> >403 input. From time to time it cavitates and big bubbles appears in the
> >output when solenoid in on. Apart from this and the inefficient method
> >comparing to a sintered glass diffuser, What would be the difference in 
>the
> >ppm over the tank?.
> >
> >Mariano
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: urville <urville at peoplepc_com>
> >>Reply-To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
> >>To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
> >>Subject: Re: [APD] CO2 in the mist
> >>Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:35:57 -0600
> >>
> >>i tried it. but i use diy and control is impossible and i went around 79
> >>ppm this way. the only thing i can think is to let it peter out more and
> >>then hook it up. of course if your using pressurized i bet it works
> >>great. i have beent old by APC members that fluvals work well , but that
> >>some other canisters can let it collect too much and it will cause the
> >>impeller to run dry if the canister isnt designed a certain way. just a
> >>heads up
> >>
> >>Terry Barber wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I am giving some thought to trying this as well.  I have read other's
> >>>
> >>>
> >>here
> >>
> >>
> >>>who don't like the method.  Anybody else do this?
> >>>
> >>>Terry
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>
> >>>To me,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>a canister filter -is- a big reactor.
> >>>>
> >>>>TW
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> >>>Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> >>>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> >>Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> >>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> >Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> >http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants
> >
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________
>Aquatic-Plants mailing list
>Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants


_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants