[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] Re: substrate vs the water column

At 01:19 PM 12/22/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>TW: So, if the plants are indifferent to the location of 
>nutrients, then why bother with any sort of fancy substrate at 
>RJS: Aesthetics?
>By 'fancy' I meant specially formulated so it has things like, 
>you know, 'power' in it.
>Or binding sites and micro-currents.
>Any of that stuff.

Welllll, it's not like people didn't grow plants with 
fresh inert quartz aquarium gravel in the past 100 years.
I know I sure have.


 /"\                         / http://lists.aquaria.net
 \ /  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / Killies, Crypts, Aponogetons
  X   AGAINST HTML MAIL    / http://new.killi.net
 / \  AND POSTINGS        / http://images.aquaria.net

Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com