Re: [APD] Re: Quoth the Walrus to the Snark

["S. Hieber" <shieber at yahoo_com>]

Yes. It makes a diff also if the reader is getting things
in digest form or singly. In digetst form, threads aren't
to hard to trace. If you get the messages one at a time, it
often is helpful to have the prior post included.

Luckily, one things doesn't have to be exactly the same
thing for all people. Sanning past the
"oh-I-don't-need-to-see-that-again" stuff takes only
moments for most of us.

It's a bit like the issue of forums versus mail lists. And
also a matter of personal prefs.

Generally, there is one to two posts per month asking for
more excision, aggressive elision. I find those notes
redundant too, but I just scan them through ;-)

sh

"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
What I tell you three times is true."  Lewis Carrol


--- Kyle Williams <amomum1 at yahoo_com> wrote:

> 
> James,
> 
> 
> 
> Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.
> 
> Also, I seriously doubt anyone quotes the entire digest
> on purpose.  I usually understand that someone made a
> mistake and don't begrudge them the extra three seconds
> out of my day it took to scroll past it.
> 
> >I realize that this might rub some folks the wrong way,
> >please direct any 
> >and all flames to damned-if-I-care.com.
> 

_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants