[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Denitrator
> From: Kevin.Buckley at uk_neceur.com
> Subject: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V6 #66
>
>
> I understood that I also have:
>
> 2) 4 NO3 + 3 S = 2 N2 + 3 SO4
I'm pretty sure it's not that simple, particularly as that
equation doesn't balance when you include the charges (as you must)
(NO3- and SO4--). Nitrate is pretty inert, which is why removing
it is not a trivial job. I think the bacteria do the job, and they
require the sulphur. I'm not a microbiologist - I would be interested
to hear from someone who knows about this.
> If so, is (2) a necessary requirement for (1) to occur (i.e. are bacteria
> using energy from (2) to enable (1) to occur - so KH erosion should be
> proportional to Nitrate removal)?
I wouldn't count on proportionality.
>
> Is it likely that other xxx'ates are also consumed (Phosphates for
> example)?
If bacteria are multiplying in there, I wouldn't be at all
surprised if other things are consumed, particularly trace metals.
The point about the KH reduction is that it is a result of H2SO4
production.
> To be honest, using the denitrator is mainly out of curiosity to see what
> happens rather than a determined attempt to control Nitrates.
I already had that impression.. :)
> Maybe all I've done is swap a Nitrate problem for a slightly smaller
> Sulphate (& KH) problem!
That is if the nitrate is a significant problem - I rather
doubt that it is. I've heard of lots of people with 50 ppm in their
water (the usual limit for human consumption).
--
Paul Sears
psears_at_nrn1.nrcan.gc.ca, 613-996-4171, facsimile / télécopieur 613-996-9400
Natural Resources Canada, 1, Haanel Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 1M1
Ressources naturelles Canada, 1, Haanel Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 1M1
Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada