[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V5 #119
- To: <Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com>
- Subject: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V5 #119
- From: "Michael Gerhardt" <breadmon at hotmail_com>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 09:05:13 -0700
- Disposition-notification-to: "Michael Gerhardt" <breadmon at hotmail_com>
- References: <200205270748.g4R7m2c17913 at acme_actwin.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 18:35:04 EDT
> From: Billinet at aol_com
> Subject: Re: Hi Tech vs. Low Tech Definition
>
> Hi,
>
> It's like pornography - we all know it when we see it or read about it.
>
> The terms are two collective modifiers that point to quite different ways
to
> manage an aquatic environment. Whether a certain technique belongs with
one
> or the other can be argued endlessly without agreement. More a
> classification issue than anything else.
>
> But, high tech and low tech cost about the same over a year? Well,
> now . . .
>
> Bill
>
They cost the same over a year the year AFTER you have invested $500 on
lights...$250 on CO2.....$150 on UV.....$150 on controller......$1000 on
substrate heating And have purchased a lifetime supply of
nutrients...($4,000)...
They the two tanks would cost the same.
Mike
>