Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #1659

[Paulio629 at aol_com]

As it is my civil right, I agree with this post. It reflects my OPINION as 
well.

In a message dated 3/2/02 2:55:35 PM Central Standard Time, 
Aquatic-Plants-Owner at actwin_com writes:


> Why do you care what anyone here thinks about you, your business, or your
> obsession with this lawsuit? You've already dismissed us as just so much
> rabble. Your posts here destroy any remaining goodwill that might turn into
> a purchase from your company. Frankly, I don't see that you have suffered
> much damage that is not self-inflicted. The original posts that are the
> subject of your lawsuit *may* have prevented *some* percentage of the 1500
> or so members of this list from placing an order from you. Your own actions
> guarantee that just about all of us won't be doing business with you. And
> even then, the actual damages are minimal. A 10% market penetration and 15%
> return on investment is considered great in any business. If 10% of us made
> an average order of $50 per year from you, and your profit margin is 15%,
> we're talking about lost income to you of $1125 per year from members of
> this forum as a result of your own actions. If you hadn't made such an ass
> out of yourself, the loss would be far less.
> 
> All of the above represents my OPINION, which is protected free speech.
> 
> 




--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/html
---

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [Redacted]
• Next by Date: Petswhorehouse
• Prev by thread: RE: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #1659
• Next by thread: Re: Our buds...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread