[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glass

To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Subject: Re: glass
From: "Daniel A. Segel" <dsegel at pacbell_net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:10:39 -0700
In-reply-to: <200107190748.f6J7m3g07902 at actwin_com>

At 03:48 AM 07/19/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>From: ". ." <cameroncase at hotmail_com>
>
>If you are still reading...is 2.5 mm too thin for the making of a 36" x 16" 
>x 16" aquarium (that will, of course, be planted...so maybe this is plant 
>related somewhat)?  I think this is ~ 1/8" but I'm not sure.  Would it help 
>if it were 36x12x12?

That's actually a tiny bit less than 1/10", which would seem pretty thin for any size aquarium. Maybe if it were tempered glass it would be OK (I think tempered glass can resist breakage due to flexure better, but somebody else who knows better might correct me.)

Daniel
--
"Being humble is why I'm a great person."
Daniel A. Segel
dsegel at pacbell_net

Prev by Date: RE: Pet stores in Atlanta
Next by Date: pet stores in Atlanta
Prev by thread: glass
Next by thread: Re: Re: Coca-cola
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread