Re: Subject lines

["George Booth" <booth at frii_com>]

> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 11:28:40 -0500
>From: "James Purchase" <jppurchase at Home_com>
>Subject: Subject lines
>
>People, people, people........ how hard can it be????
>
>It is very easy to put in a "subject line" into your e-mail posts to the
>list, and it makes it much easier to follow threads if you
>do......."Subject: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #XXX" really doesn't give
>anyone much of a clue.  If you think that your advice is worth reading, you
>should make the effort before hitting the "send" button.


I second the notion and have a further suggestion. All posts should have
approved subject lines consisting of a nested set of categories. Only the
last item in the nest could be a new topic IFF it really was new. Anyone
creating a new subject line when it really wasn't new would be ejected from
the list. I'm sure Cynthia will support me on this.

Not being one to simply b-lather away without making a concrete and useful
recommendation, I will offer these subject lines to start the approved list:

Chemistry
Chemistry.Simple
Chemistry.Involved
Chemistry.Pushak
Plants
Plants.Wet
Plants.Dry
Plants.Dead
Algae
Algea.Good
Algea.Bad
Algea.Bad.DieDieDie
Equipment
Equipment.CO2
Equipment.CO2.Forbidden
Equipment.AllOther
Humor
Humor.George
Humor.AllOther

BTW :-)

George Booth in Ft. Collins, CO (booth at frii dot com)
The web site for Aquatic Gardeners by Aquatic Gardeners
  http://www.frii.com/~booth/AquaticConcepts/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: phosphate removal poll
• Next by Date: Re: Catching fish in a planted tank / fish trap
• Prev by thread: Subject lines
• Next by thread: Aqua-Trail Spam [off-topic]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread