Re: Magazine errors

[Dinyar Lalkaka <lalkaka at bellatlantic_net>]

I've let my subscriptions to all three o he major magazines lapse. Although
there are a handful of high quality contributors like Karen Randall and Lee
Finley, I felt the value they added was more than subtracted by the
magazines' lax editorial standards and sloppy production. I suspect that if
the major aquarium mags don't clean up their act, the web and small upstarts
like Dave Gomberg's magazine will put them out of business sooner or later.

Dinyar

> From: Aquatic-Plants-Owner at actwin_com (Aquatic Plants Digest)
> Reply-To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:48:01 -0400 (EDT)
> To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> Subject: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #259
> 
> Let me tell you the realities of the aquarium magazine business.  There are
> MANY mistakes printed in all 3 of the major magazines.  FAMA is probably
> worst because of their no-editing editorial policy.  <snip> Over all, I still
> think the magazines do more good than bad for our hobby.

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Lighting help
• Next by Date: tropica plants
• Prev by thread: Magazine errors
• Next by thread: Trilobate Java Ferns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread