[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #203
- To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
- Subject: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V4 #203
- From: Greg Morin <greg at seachem_com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:56:08 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <200004070748.DAA20338 at actwin_com>
- References: <200004070748.DAA20338 at actwin_com>
>
>My question would be: is this a replacement for CO2 injection? How
>would two otherwise identical plant tanks fare, one with flourish
>excel and the other with CO2 injection (the answer to that one might
>be a somewhat complex "it depends" ;) Maybe a better question
>would be what type of setup would have the most to gain by the
>addition of flourish).
Strictly speaking, no, it's not going to 100% replace CO2 injection,
but it will provide, in terms of subjective growth, say between
50%-75% of what CO2 can provide (and yes, that of course will depend
;-). The type of setup that would most benefit is one where no CO2
injection is being used.
-Greg Morin
Gregory Morin, Ph.D. ~~~~~~~Research Director~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seachem Laboratories, Inc. www.seachem.com 888-SEACHEM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~