[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NFC: Re: Native Fish Conservancy Digest V2 #886
- To: NFC at actwin_com
- Subject: NFC: Re: Native Fish Conservancy Digest V2 #886
- From: Arlus Farnsworth <arlusf at cwnet_com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:56:39 -0800
- References: <200203100818.g2A8I4w16722 at acme_actwin.com>
There must be other birds than the herons living there at least part of
the year... what could be better than low cost housing in the middle of
a nature preserve? There would be a long list of birders, naturalists
and people who want to live in a pristine area to get in there. If the
housing was properly constructed... tenants would help track the bird
populations. what would the requirements be? Could something like this
be viable? I would consider my taxes well spent.
Arlus
>
> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:26:43 -0600
> From: "Kristine Weisbrod Massin" <kwmprairie at hotmail_com>
> Subject: Re: NFC: Somewhat OT
>
> call all the birding clubs---they've got a surprising amount of clout. I'm
> unaware of any herons in that part of the US that even rank 'species of
> special concern' designation so you probably won't have much luck that
> route. May be able to go the roundabout method and get local citizens
> groups opposed to it base on the 'quality of life' argument. You could
> probably beat the park-and-ride, but you're going to have a tough time
> convincing people that birds are more important than low cost housing
> (especially the with the economy).
>
> Sorry can't be more help,
> kris
>
Follow-Ups: