[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NFC: fish euthanasia
Well, I'm not one who agrees totally with this view, and I've said so in
the past. I think their are situations where you can return a fish. I
know this makes me unpopular, as well as going against NFC stated policy,
but...I've never been afraid of controversy before. LOL
Luke
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Sam B wrote:
> Guess I'll jump in after all. YOU NEVER- READ NEVER- RETURN ANY FISH TO THE
> WILD. IF IT HAS BEEN IN A TANK, IT STAYS IN A TANK OR IS DESTROYED. Sorry
> for yelling. This is not being NASTY; this is protecting the environment.
> Get a handle on things Chris.
> Sam
> This is not a flame- it is just how things are.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nfc at actwin_com [mailto:owner-nfc at actwin_com]On Behalf Of
> Chris Perry
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:10 PM
> To: nfc at actwin_com
> Subject: Re: NFC: fish euthanasia
>
>
> Ok, well, This is what I've read in books to do. I personally stick them
> in the freezer. Can't stand to slam a fish against the wall. I also meant
> to put it back into the stream where he got it! No need to be so nasty
> about it...
>
> Chris Perry, Partner
> E Fish Solutions
> fishystuff00
> fishystuff00 at hotmail_com
>
>
>
> >From: "D. Martin Moore" <archimed at netdoor_com>
> >Reply-To: nfc at actwin_com
> >To: <nfc at actwin_com>
> >Subject: Re: NFC: fish euthanasia
> >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:42:08 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from [140.239.226.140] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> >MHotMailBD6163C4009740042A198CEFE28C97BE0; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:45:58 -0700
> >Received: (from majordom@localhost)by actwin.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
> >f870eKE00708for nfc-outgoing at actwin_com; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 20:40:20 -0400
> >(EDT)
> >Received: from pike.netdoor.com (netdoor.com [208.137.128.6])by actwin.com
> >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f870e8100695for <nfc at actwin_com>; Thu, 6 Sep
> >2001 20:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
> >Received: from narabedla (port673.erdial.netdoor.com [208.148.211.73])by
> >pike.netdoor.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA26245for <nfc at actwin_com>;
> >Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:40:56 -0500 (CDT)
> >From owner-nfc at actwin_com Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:46:39 -0700
> >Message-ID: <003001c13735$f1b37970$251dfea9@narabedla>
> >References: <F168qhav4DaZEqvJo9i00004c94 at hotmail_com>
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> >Sender: owner-nfc at actwin_com
> >Precedence: bulk
> >
> >I have tried the former after seeing the method illustrated in a book, and
> >it DOES NOT WORK well. The fish can live for a long time after having its
> >spine severed behind the head. As for why you shouldn't "let it go into a
> >stream"...I', sure there are many others waiting to weigh in on THAT one!
> >
> >Prost,
> >
> >Martin
> >Jackson, MS
> >----------------------
> >I think someone should have had the decency to tell me the luncheon was
> >free.
> >To make someone run out with potato salad in his hand, pretending he's
> >throwing up, is not what I call hospitality.
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Chris Perry" <fishystuff00 at hotmail_com>
> >To: <nfc at actwin_com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:39 PM
> >Subject: Re: NFC: fish euthanasia
> >
> >
> > > Why not just let it go into a stream? A simple, fast cut right behind
> >the
> > > head is fast and painless. Another, less bloody way is to just put them
> >in
> > > the freezer (make sure that they have water). Not sure how humane that
> >is
> > > tho.
> > >
> > > Chris Perry, Partner
> > > E Fish Solutions
> > > fishystuff00
> > > fishystuff00 at hotmail_com
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/mixed
> application/ms-tnef
> ---
>
Follow-Ups:
References: