[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pathogens and tubifex/blackworms
- To: Live-Foods at actwin_com
- Subject: Pathogens and tubifex/blackworms
- From: David Lyle Robinson <robinson at ichips_intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 13:26:18 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <199812142058.PAA22761 at acme_actwin.com> from Live Foods Digest at "Dec 14, 98 03:58:02 pm"
> It's way too labor and equipment intensive for any reasonable fish
> purposes. The guy I know who developed the above method (after trying a
> lot of failed ones) did it because he was convinced they carry fish
> pathogens (which they don't). He wanted "pure" worms. :-)
> Neither tubifex nor blackworms can carry any known fish pathogens,
> according to the head of the Vet. Pathology Dept. at Cornell. He's an
> avid aquarist, BTW.
I'd be interested of his opinion related to intermediate stages of
tapeworm. I am definately not an expert. However, I corresponded
with an expert in the "blackworm" field (he is a researcher and
consults on the side for blackworm farmers). According to him, an
intermediate stage in the tapeworm life-cycle can be carried by these
worms. It was definately *not* in his interest to spread this information
around, so I'm inclined to believe it.
However, as I say, I'm not an expert and can only rely on those who are.
Can you ask this prof's opinion specifically with regards to tapeworm?
Perhaps he didn't think of this since tapeworm is a multi-lifecycle
organism that requires multiple hosts.
David Robinson The Discus Page
David.Robinson at intel_com http://www.ee.pdx.edu/~davidr/