Sue Katzand her extra PAL -Reply

[William Vannerson <William_Vannerson at ama-assn_org>]

>>Perhaps the BNL can maintain a list or even run a list on KillieTalk
leaving the sender incognito to avoid being deluged personally by
requests.<<

Hmm...  Kind of a blind P.O. Box.  Interesting idea.  Can it be done easily,
Barry?

>>On the Internet the word can be passed rapidly, but that is sort of
unfair to those without online service.<<

In this case, Sue already bypassed the non-net folks, with or without an
organized effort by the AKA.  Also, she sounded as if she was in dire
need to relieve overcrowding.  The BNL may not have been timely
enough.  So her only other recourse would have been to cull the extra
fish.  With the email message, many fish keepers have benefited that
may not have been the case otherwise.

There are no easy answers.  Yes, those without Internet access are at
a disadvantage, regardless of the AKA's stance.  Perhaps there are
ways we could work out that reduce this disadvantage.  Such as
release electronic F&E listings weekly all at the same time while
simultaneously fax or mail a hard copy to non-net folks who wish to
subscribe to the service.  Just a thought.



Bill Vannerson
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/william_vannerson

---

• Prev by Date: Re: KillieTalk Digest V2 #68
• Next by Date: ChiKA's Operation Fish Drop -Reply
• Prev by thread: ChiKA's Operation Fish Drop
• Next by thread: ChiKA's Operation Fish Drop -Reply
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread