[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Killietalk] Commercial imports; what to label them?



Hey Fred, yea we can think and yea, I get it.  If there is an elaborate history about the historic collections, then the hobbyist will find out as best as he/she can.  I have heard all this stuff ever since I have been on killietalk. If there wasn't a hobbyist to buy the fish, then the collector would'nt have named it with his code, would he? I say dont buy fish from nuts.  Thats what I have learned.

Mark Delraso

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Fred Behrmann <athensaquatics at juno_com> 

> Hi Kingfish, The ponds are not numbered with a sign when you walk up to 
> them. NOT LIKE This is pond 11 and anyone who collects from this 
> pond must give us credit for owning pond 11. It's more like Keith Jones 
> from England collects from this certain pond (near East Bumfuck), but it 
> is the 3rd pond he dipped his net into on this trip(2007). These fish 
> carry the code , East Bumfuck KF 03-07. Next year if he chooses to route 
> his trip differently it could be called pond 14( East Bumfuck KJ 14-08). 
> Now Karl Jones from Germany does a little collecting also and visits that 
> certain pond on his vacation in 2008 . It's the first hole he ever dipped 
> into and the thing he pulls out is called by location , East Bumfuck KJ 
> 01- 08. On his vacation next year he decides to reverse his route and 
> this particular pond now becomes KJ 17 -09 . He hears about the other nut 
> in England and they decide that for 2011 they will meet in Xxx and do 
> collecting together. When they come to the pond that looks very familiar 
> to both of them it becomes KJKJ 11-11 for any fish either one of them 
> collects from the 11th pond the two of them visited and collected from 
> together. Do you get it. Collection codes are FOR the collectors NOT 
> the person or persons receiving the collections. Can't you people think 
> out there! on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 
> 02:09:05 +0000 kingfish77 at comcast_net writes: 
> > David, 
> > 
> > I don't know if I can give you the answer that you are looking for, 
> > but I can tell you what I do. Take A. bochtleri GWW 86-11. I have 
> > had this location for a long time. So, when I have had them going 
> > for awhile, I will shop for the same location to preserve it's 
> > phenotype. Even if the other hobbyist aquired initial breeding stock 
> > at relatively the same time, I will cross his/her strain of 86-11's 
> > to keep the strain going. In this particular fish, a moderate 
> > degree of variability occurs. I do not line breed for just the 
> > really gaudy individuals because I am trying to keep them natural as 
> > possible. The last time that I did this, I was lucky enough to 
> > aquire stock from Europe. Those individuals had been maintained by 
> > a hobbyist that was one of the first to get them in 1987. My strain 
> > ( location: my fishroom) still look like the original examples that 
> > I first fell in love with years ago. The other varieties of 
> > bochtleri are not colored the same. They are more purple and 
> > green. 
> > Even though you could argue that once you have kept them going for 
> > a long time, you possibly get stuck with a single fish, you might 
> > say well I just get a male from the other location to keep them 
> > going. Well you can do that as long as you indicate that it is just 
> > an aquarium strain - no location.But the thing is, you have actually 
> > just lost the strain if you ended up with an individual and crossed 
> > it to a different location. 
> > 
> > One of the things that I appreciated about killifish hobbyist when I 
> > first got involved in the AKA, was that there was an aim to conserve 
> > the fish, as best as possible, as it's original phenotype. No 
> > sports! It does not matter to me at all that they have been away, 
> > many generations from the wild. I am trying to capture the fish, 
> > long term, in it's natural state. A living work of art. So, what way 
> > do I accomplish that? I keep track of the location and find out 
> > who else is working with the same fish. Quite frankly, I would 
> > seriously be upset if someone passed me a pair of fish that had 
> > another location in the wood pile. To me, even though they may be 
> > good looking fish, it is not the same. 
> > 
> > When you write about the commercial imports, and how you have no 
> > consistency of a code, just call them CI from whatever year. That 
> > is all that is needed for that grade of fish. There is nothing 
> > wrong with commercial imports, but those fish are segregated from 
> > the ones that have real location info in my fishroom. Often times, 
> > commercial imports are the only way to aquire the fish. I am 
> > inclined to say that this may be one of the best reasons to get 
> > stock from known and reliable sources (AKA) I certainly have 
> > nothing against anyone providing commercial import stock to those 
> > who are interested in them, but when a member of the club spends his 
> > or her resources to go and collect fish, and I get some, I am 
> > keeping the location straight as long as I have them. If you take a 
> > look at some of the annuals that are being collected in South 
> > America, you can see slight differences, a grading of the species 
> > just in a few miles distance from each other. The best way that I 
> > can say why ke 
> > ep tra 
> > ck is by mentioning that each location is a painting. You dont 
> > throw all of the Salvador Dali's in a room and indicate Artwork on 
> > the door. Each painting gets a special spot on a wall with a title. 
> > It gives them meaning. And if they are commercial prints, they can 
> > still be enjoyed. If they are not signed by the artist, then who 
> > knows? I am not trying to be argumentative, but we have given this 
> > subject too much attention this week. You know another wat to look 
> > at it is that locations are how we communicate to each other. Like 
> > mathemiticians, we know what our fellow hobbyist is talking about 
> > because we are speaking the same language, even if some of the terms 
> > are not consistent. You know: Misaje, G24-80, Zomoko, and so on. I 
> > am pretty sure most that have been around for awhile know those fish 
> > by their location while the names may have changed. 
> > 
> > Mark Delraso 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Mark Delraso 
> > Indianapolis 
> > 
> > -------------- Original message -------------- 
> > From: John Jabba 
> > 
> > > David et al; 
> > > Okay, there are other fish that have collection codes. I'll give 
> > you that. 
> > > But nobody has addressed one of my questions and the one I feel is 
> > most 
> > > important. Why should a given pair of killies kept and bred in a 
> > hobbyists tank 
> > > keep a collection code from a location that they are extremely 
> > remote from in 
> > > terms of generations of fish. They have bee bred and have grown up 
> > in a far 
> > > different biotope than the original pair of imported fish. For 
> > example, a pair 
> > > out of your tanks, if a collection code is given, should be DL01. 
> > Your initials 
> > > and sequence number. Actually from things I have heard in the past 
> > some of the 
> > > codes really weren't that valid because the importers didn't like 
> > to advertise 
> > > some of their collecting sites. And in a lot of cases in this day 
> > and age the 
> > > importers are not even with the collectors and who knows if they 
> > are really 
> > > giving a location or just satisfying us with some numbers and 
> > letters... 
> > > 
> > > Maybe I have too much time on my hands and thinking too much. But 
> > I believe 
> > > these are valid points for discussion. we did get alopng for a lot 
> > of years 
> > > without collecting codes and it didn't seem to harm the hobby... 
> > > 
> > > John J. 
> > > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:33:40 -0700 
> > > From: "David Lains" 
> > > Subject: Re: [Killietalk] Commercial imports; what to label them? 
> > 
> > > To: "'killifish discussion list'" 
> > > 
> > > Hi John 
> > > 
> > > I would argue that many cichlids have locations and well not 
> > guppies but 
> > > species livebearers have both collection codes and locations. 
> > > 
> > > It's true we'll likely never return fish to the wild but at least 
> > we can try 
> > > to maintain distinct populations. 
> > > 
> > > Best Fishes 
> > > David 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------- 
> > > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk 
> > email the boot 
> > > with the All-new Yahoo! Mail 
> > > Join the AKA at 
> > http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9. 
> > > Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/ 
> > > Modify your subscription at 
> > > http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk 
> > Join the AKA at 
> > http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9. 
> > Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/ 
> > Modify your subscription at 
> > http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Sincerely, 
> Fred Behrmann 
> Athens Aquatics 
> 37 W. Bridge Street 
> Catskill, NY 12414 Phone:(518) 943-2630 
> Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9. 
> Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/ 
> Modify your subscription at 
> http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk 
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9.
Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk