[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Killietalk] RO

To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: [Killietalk] RO
From: LeeH920226 at aol_com
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:56:20 EDT
List-archive: <http://www.actwin.com/pipermail/killietalk>
List-help: <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=help>
List-id: killifish discussion list <killietalk.aka.org>
List-post: <mailto:killietalk@aka.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/killietalk>, <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/killietalk>, <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In a message dated 10/9/06 5:49:17 PM, Rivulus1 at cs_com writes:

<< Is it normal for an RO filter to produce the water faster after a new 
membrane is installed?
 >>

Yes, and it should be better quality (lower TDS).

Lee Harper
Media PA
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9.
Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Killietalk] RO
  - From: Edd Kray

Prev by Date: [Killietalk] RO
Next by Date: Re: [Killietalk] RO
Previous by thread: Re: [Killietalk] RO
Next by thread: Re: [Killietalk] RO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread