Re: [Killietalk] Primigenium GBN 88-10

[Wright Huntley <whuntley at verizon_net>]

Keith Cook wrote:

>Here's one for the taxonomists out there.
>
>Is Aphy. primigenium GBN 88-10 actually primigenium or is it an aff.
>primigenium?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Keith
>
>Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9.
>Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
>Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk
>
>  
>
My understanding was that the collectors weren't sure (wishing for a new 
species discovery? ;-)) but they are apparently not "affinis" as 
originally labelled. I believe they are just primigenium, and a 
particularly lovely strain, at that.

Free advice, of course, is worth every penny. Since I don't mix 
collections, it makes no difference to me.

Wright

-- 
Wright Huntley - Rt. 001 Box K36, Bishop CA 93514 - whuntley at verizon_net  760 937-2276 (cell) 760 874-2000 (CA) or 941 866-0500 (FL).

"A state is a territorial monopolist of compulsion,... " -- Hans-Hermann Hoppe  

World's smallest political quiz. Where are you in the political spectrum?                         

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html
                     



Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/aka/modules/content/index.php?id=9.
Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk