[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity

To: killifish discussion list <killietalk at aka_org>
Subject: Re: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
From: Barry Cooper <bjc3 at centurytel_net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:35:28 -0800
In-reply-to: <p06200703c0084beed3e6@[24.217.175.99]>
List-archive: <http://www.actwin.com/pipermail/killietalk>
List-help: <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=help>
List-id: killifish discussion list <killietalk.aka.org>
List-post: <mailto:killietalk@aka.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/killietalk>, <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/killietalk>, <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.13033.1138922164.15042.killietalk@aka.org> <p06200703c0084beed3e6@[24.217.175.99]>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)

>Conductivity is a very different thing. It is a measure of the 
>conduction of electrical current through the medium or as we have 
>come to learn it: the resistance of the medium to conduction.

Or at least, the reciprocal of resistivity.

Barry

Barry J. Cooper
Sweet Home, OR 97386


Join the AKA at http://aka.org/modules/tinycontent0/index.php?id=9
Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk

References:
- [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
  - From: Charles & Sue Harrison

Prev by Date: Re: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
Next by Date: Re: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
Previous by thread: Re: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
Next by thread: [Killietalk] TDS vs. Conductivity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread