[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Killietalk] Redirect -- Improving the AKA -- Shipping fish
I couldn't agree with this statement more....
Well written Dave
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:02:15 -0500
"Koran, David HQ02" <David_Koran at hq02.usace.army.mil>
wrote:
> I have tried to use this forum to discover what are
>problems and perceived
> problems. During the next few days I hope to read and
>analyze many of the
> posts that have been flying by but one issue that has
>bugged me endlessly is
> the lack of use of AKA sponsored media to list killifish
>availability to our
> members. What I read, at least in my book, is a cop
>out.
>
> Since I first joined the AKA over 30 years ago the cost
>of shipping fish,
> basic shipping, is still very small. Attempting to use
>postage as an excuse
> for not shipping fish is the wrong excuse. If you look
>way back when you
> would expect to pay $1.50 for a pair of fish for
>postage, then maybe add a
> quarter per pair after that. However, check the prices
>on fish back then.
> Average killie prices were $3-$5 a pair. So if you
>purchased say 3 pair of
> fish from someone, figure you spent about $15, maybe
>$12-13 on the fish and
> $2 on postage -- first class or priority mail at that.
> If you shipped "air
> mail" it was more but you already knew that if you were
>shipping more than
> say 1500 miles the package usually went via air mail so
>you skipped the
> expense. I seem to recall you could also purchase for
>less than $2 something
> like "Special Delivery" which supposedly expedited the
>shipment.
>
> So lets move ahead 30 years for all of you tightwads.
> $10 for a pair of
> killies is deemed cheap these days so you are looking at
>probably $30 for
> those same 3 pairs of killies. So you should be looking
>at about $5 for 1st
> class or priority mail shipping. I know I can still
>mail a box of fish for
> that amount. Maybe you don't know how to ship fish or
>is it we have lost the
> art of shipping fish?
>
> In the last 2 years I have shipped fish to Europe. I
>have shipped small
> packages with at most 6 pairs per box. These where
>boxes of 8" x 8" x 8"
> including insulation and I didn't use breathable bags.
> No, not all fish made
> it but 90% or more usually did, even though most often
>they were in transit
> at least 5 days and maybe up to 8. No heat packs used,
>no drugging, no pure
> oxygen, etc. Killies are tough fish, stop treating them
>like you are
> shipping porcelain. I was also able to ship most boxes
>for under $20 a box.
>
> Second, take some time to think about your shipping
>route. If you drive the
> Interstate highways for any distance you are bound to
>run across semis
> carting the mail. For most mail, it goes by truck.
> Look at the back of the
> truck, you will see the route it takes. There is a
>normal back and forth
> trip. The guy who has one of the contracts will lug
>mail from say Pittsburgh
> to St. Louis and then back so you are talking maybe 700
>miles each way,
> probably a one day trip each time. Next, look at your
>zip codes. Notice
> that when your last two digits are 01 or at least less
>than 10 you are
> probably looking at the regional postal center, or the
>point from where the
> trucks depart from or arrive. Your package is sorted at
>the regional center
> and put on a truck I am sure within 8 hours after you
>post it at the counter
> and there is a good bet it is at the central postal
>center of the recipient
> 24 hours later if it is traveling 500 miles or less (or
>maybe even more
> distant)(well maybe for larger city locations). Break
>this down more for
> smaller regions. So what is your risk? Mainly, the
>exposure period to
> outside temperature and for how long -- you simply don't
>ship when you know
> fish will be exposed to temperatures below 40 or above
>90 for more than say
> 4-6 hours. But remember, the fish are in bags with
>water (some thermal
> mass), you boxed them with some material to reduce heat
>transport, they are
> in with other mail-paper does have insulating
>properties-and they are inside
> of a trailer, a little more resistance to heat exchange.
>
>For fish shipped by normal 1st class postage, I don't
>think this process has
> changed in 30 years, we just perceive that it has gotten
>worse.
>
> Now for a revolutionary concept--rent a P.O. Box at the
>post office. I don't
> think my PO's are different than yours. In my area they
>have sets of lockers
> in the box section. If a package doesn't fit in your
>little box, meaning all
> fish boxes!!, they place them in a locker and put the
>key in your box.
> Hence, I have 24 hour access to shipments I receive and
>they are placed in
> the lockers after initial sorting -- and here's the best
>part, they are kept
> at climate controlled conditions! True, that costs me
>$48 a year but I don't
> have fish sitting on my porch or in my mailbox at home
>when it is roasting or
> freezing outside. That also means receiving fish sent
>1st class with
> virtually no losses in over 10 years so I make up here
>for the box rental fee
> instead of paying for express mail. It also helps that
>this is the main P.O.
> in the region and it handles zipcodes 01-09.
>
> So, if I am able to debunk the argument that shipping
>fish costs too much,
> now why aren't they advertised for sale more often?
>
> Dave K
>
> Join the AKA at
>http://aka.org/modules/tinycontent0/index.php?id=9
> Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
> Modify your subscription at
>http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk
Join the AKA at http://aka.org/modules/tinycontent0/index.php?id=9
Archives are at http://fins.actwin.com/killietalk/
Modify your subscription at http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk