[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal

To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal
From: LeeH920226 at aol_com
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:25:00 EST
List-help: <mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=help>
List-id: killifish discussion list <killietalk.aka.org>
List-post: <mailto:killietalk@aka.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk>,<mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/killietalk>,<mailto:killietalk-request@aka.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In a message dated 11/16/03 11:58:11 AM, LeeH920226 at aol_com writes:

<<  Even if my estimate is off by a twofold 
error, it seems cheap for the carbon. >>

Actually, I believe this estimate to be pretty good. On reviewing the water 
bill for that period, it amounts to about 25% of our whole water usage for all 
the household, including watering the garden and changing water in aquariums 
not utilizing the carbon adsorption system.

Lee Harper
Media, PA

To join the AKA see http://www.aka.org/pages/join.html

Prev by Date: Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal
Next by Date: Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal
Previous by thread: Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal
Next by thread: Re: [Killietalk] Chlorine removal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread