From: "william ruyle" <wruyle at hotmail_com>
Reply-To: killifish discussion list <killietalk at aka_org>
To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: [Killietalk] New topic- Directway Cost/Restrictions was Bounce
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 02:39:30 +0000
Drummond Howard wrote:
I do know soeone with Direcway and spent many hours working on it. It
requires a seperate dish and receiver. The receivers for tv do not
change. It is expensive, and prior to the most recent software upgrade it
was very slow for normal surfing. Dial-up was faster. The new
software(which is XP compatible) uses proxy and is a lot faster. They
also have a new modem coming out that uses a network connection rather
than the USB on the old modem. I haven't seen any download restrictions,
but they aren't running Kazaa and downloading movies 24/7 either. It is
an option if DSL or Cable are not, buit it is an expensive option. DSL
costs me $30 a month and I can't complain about the speed or quality.
After the trouble I had with DirecTV in Maine when we had storms that would
knock the signal out for up to 12 hours at a stretch, I went with cable
down
here in Alabama. Wouldn't atmospheric conditions wreak the same havoc with
Direcway? Now that I've had my cable modem replaced (power cord kept
shorting
out and knocking me off the net) I can heartily recommend it. It is a
little pricey
(49.95 per month, ComCast) compared to dialup, but that's the price I pay
for
my wife to watch ThaiTV on the computer.
Bill
_________________________________________________________________
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!
https://broadband.msn.com
To join the AKA see http://www.aka.org/pages/join.html