[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Collecting wild fish (AKA sponsorship, Part 3)
- To: killietalk at aka_org
- Subject: Re: Collecting wild fish (AKA sponsorship, Part 3)
- From: Wright Huntley <jwwiii at pacbell_net>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 03:16:31 -0700
- References: <164.23f2d556.2c5c8ee3@aol.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
RuevenM at aol_com wrote:
snip...
This is yet another reason why I feel an on line real time F&EL is so
vitally important to the future of the AKA. I totally disagree with Wright in
that I feel part of the AKA's very reason for existance is to aid members in
distributing fish. It is now failing in that vital part of its legacy and reality
because it has decided to only look backwards at the needs of a few while
forgetting the needs of today, the possibilities of today -- not to mention the
needs of all foreign based members. I believe a real time on line F&EL could
serve as a substitute for the old idea of a N&RSC because more people could list
more fish and more rare fish could be sold to the membership. The on line
feature would allow people to organize themselves and their fishroom activities
when it came to selling and sending far better than what we have today. I
believe it would open up the fishrooms of the AKA and move fish around.
Auctions and affiliate clubs only serve a portion of the membership but
since it is a particularly active and connected part of the membership it's
fish needs are met and so changing the F&EL to a real time on line format is not
a crucial issue to this portion of the membership.
I do not think we disagree, Bobby. I just said we should have some
compelling reasons to get involved in fish trade that furthers the AKA
goals. If adequate fish trade is provided for outside AKA, fine. If
boosting the trade will encourage the breeders, even better.
You just gave a couple of very good reasons for pushing an on-line trading
mechanism. Personally, I don't think it should resemble the F&E format, as
that has built into it some archaic features that are part of what folks
don't like about it. It is inherently unfair, for example. Why propagate
that feature with a classified ad on line that does the same thing?
A bad painting looks just as bad (or worse) on a web page. Attempts to use
the web like a brick and mortar storefront have always failed miserably,
so why should we try to duplicate that known way to fail? Let's leave the
F&E alone, and use the newer technology to do what it does best.
Off to look at what the CP folks are up to. :-)
Wright
--
Wright Huntley -- 760 872-3995 -- Rt. 001 Box K36, Bishop CA 93514
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/pages/killietalk/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/pages/join.html