RE: FW: Austrol. nigripinnis Molina or Molino? Molino is correct

["Stoecker,Michael,FRANKLIN PARK,NC&C" <michael.stoecker at us_nestle.com>]

Hi Harry,
If "Molino" is correct then why does "Molina" appear as a collection
location in the second article of the last JAKA?  The article was devoted to
a round table discussion of SA annuals.
Which is right, which is wrong?  Maybe both are correct, but the names are
too close for nomenclatural comfort for me not to ask.
Don't we have a bunch of SA specialists on this list?  They are awful quiet
on this, but perhaps they don't know either.  Somebody knows.
Thanks,
mike

-----Original Message-----
From: AUS62 at aol_com [mailto:AUS62 at aol_com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:53 PM
To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: FW: Austrol. nigripinnis Molina or Molino? Molino is
correct


Refer to KMI IV , page 62

Uruguayan populations of Austrolebias nigripinnis Regan, 1912   

Two populationos: 

Carco de Molino  --   Ceibas

maschwistz        ---  Molino (variation of Caco de Molino)

I thought you had learned of the spelling before this, Mike

                                                             Harry Specht
                                                             Sarasota, FL

---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm