[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: fishy camera
- To: KillieTalk at aka_org
- Subject: RE: fishy camera
- From: "Allen Boatman" <Allen.Boatman at sdhc_k12.fl.us>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:23:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <200209250928.g8P9S3o18894 at acme_actwin.com>
- References: <200209250928.g8P9S3o18894 at acme_actwin.com>
Something wasn't mentioned that I think bears sating. There is another
advantage, Wright, to digital cameras. We might assume everyone would
already know this, but not everyone out there uses digital cameras.
With digital cameras, you don't have to buy film, you don't have to wonder
if that last exposure was recorded on the roll or not, you don't have to
worry about accidental exposure, you can take hundreds of pictures per
"roll" (my mvc-cd1000 records 130+ super high res jpegs per mini-cd.), and
you don't have to pay, nor wait for, development. Double exposures never
happen. And idiots like me can take pictures that rival pictures taken by
people who know what f-stop, shutter spead and light meter mean.
I'll say this, I don't have 4 grand to blow on a camera, but that is a
nice piece of equipment you posted, Wright. And I would compare it to
anything I've seen before. 36mm x 24mm is a HUGE recording surface!!
Just my 2 cents worth.
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm