Re: OT censorship (Re: deltaense: fallax vs gulare)

[BizEcology at aol_com]

Well, Allen, to respond....

<<Well, I guess the next thing proposed will be censorship, based on a need
 for SOME to impose THEIR views on others.  Surely YOU don’t find it
 offensive, Larry?  >>

I wasn't asking for censorship, just stating an opinion.  Of course, some 
people think that any opinion with which they disagree is a danger.  So why 
do you feel the need to flame at me?  Your twisting what I said is a typical 
emotional reaction.  I suggest a nap.

<< How come you don’t chastise others for their political
 comments in their sig lines, >>

I have done that before.  Again, the word "chastise" has collateral 
implications that are not accurate, but I have commented on those who felt 
the need to rant on politically in SIG lines.

<<or perhaps I ought to drop the line from my sig line that says “one nation 
under God…”  But then again, well that is  in the pledge of allegiance 
(which is being torn apart as we speak.)  >>

As far as the pledge of allegiance is concerned.....

I learned it before the frothing zealots of Joe McCarthy inserted the words 
"under god," so I don't recognize that as a legitimate part of it anyway.
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm