[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sodium Sulfite

To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: Sodium Sulfite
From: Wright Huntley <jwwiii at pacbell_net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:20:37 -0800
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011124200758.0293a0b0 at postoffice_mail.cornell.edu><01a501c1b96f$b5086820$9d00a8c0@joe2prb3iotwlr><001e01c1b978$62ee8f20$ea7b2d18@dan>

"Daniel S. Katz" wrote:
> 
> No way.  It's totally different.  Sodium sulfide is very non-reactive.

Probably the correct answer but to the wrong substance. :-) I think Jose
asked about sodium sulfite, and not sodium sulfide. I'm pretty sure sodium
sulfite, while reactive, is not a substitute for thiosulfate (hypo).

Wright

-- 
Wright Huntley -- 650 843-1240 -- 866 Clara Dr. Palo Alto CA 94303 
                    http://www.sfbaka.net.

   Instead of giving money to found colleges to promote
   learning, why don't they pass a constitutional amendment
   prohibiting anybody from learning anything? If it works as
   good as the Prohibition one did, why, in five years we would
   have the smartest race of people on earth. -- Will Rogers

---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm

Follow-Ups:

Re: Sodium Sulfite

From: "Jose E. Castillo" <jcastillo at prodigy_net>

References:

Sodium Sulfite

From: "Jose E. Castillo" <jcastillo at prodigy_net>

Re: Sodium Sulfite

From: "Daniel S. Katz" <dskatz at optonline_net>

Prev by Date: Re: Blue-Green Algae
Next by Date: Re: Blue-green algea - This is OFF TOPIC
Prev by thread: Re: Sodium Sulfite
Next by thread: Re: Sodium Sulfite
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread