[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: photographic tank & Photos
At 02:22 PM 12/10/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At 10:15 AM 12/10/01 -0800, you wrote:
>>BTW, Tony's love for the old slow Kodachrome is understandable, but it has
>>just plain been outmoded by newer formulations, and better processing
>>methods.
>>Much faster films have every bit as fine grain as those old dye-transfer
>>methods.
>
>
> Yea I know, that's another one of those older than dirt
> jokes..... I can be understood and accepted cause I'm too old to accept
> new film ... I get it Wright : )
>
> I still think that the overall value of killies shot wit
> Kodachrome is closer to real life, I found that Ektachrome Pro was
> second, but have always stuck with Kodachrome because of its archival
> value, I have 5 year old slides just as crisp as the day they were
> taken. Also I can get Kodak processing with their quality which has been
> outstanding over 30 years for $5.99 per 6 exposure roll . let's not talk
> about the disaster of local developing of slides unless it is a custom
> lab .........
>
> That's 35 year old slides not 5 ..... see another older
> than dirt moment...
Tony
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Join the AKA at http://www.aka.org/AKA/Applic.htm
References: