[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax

To: killietalk at aka_org
Subject: Re: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax
From: Konstantin <avt156400 at mtu-net_ru>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 10:38:45 +0400
In-reply-To: <TCPSMTP.21.7.26.7.36.30.2375921346.25628380 at bbs_ecr.net>
References: <TCPSMTP.21.7.26.7.36.30.2375921346.25628380 at bbs_ecr.net>

Hello All


sen> Actually, it's a pretty recent nomenclatural change, though it's been
sen> under discussion for a while. The Baensch Atlases, for example, still
sen> list gardneri as Aphyosemion, and I gather that the change hasn't been
sen> accepted in Europe too well yet.

Could anybody explain, what characteristics were used for
distinguishing of Fundulopanchax in a separate genus. With what
all Fundulopanchach species differ from all species genus Aphyosemion


-- 
Best regards,
 Konstantin                            mailto:avt156400 at mtu-net_ru


---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:

Re: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax

From: "Al Anderson" <killiman at iquest_net>

Re: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax

From: Wright Huntley <huntley1 at home_com>

References:

Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax

From: schmidtcarney at ecr_net

Prev by Date: Re: leaded or unleaded filters ?
Next by Date: Re: leaded or unleaded filters ?
Prev by thread: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax
Next by thread: Re: Aphyosemion to Fundulopanchax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread