[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fp. oeseri

Doug Karpa-Wilson wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> It seems to me that now that we have four sources that oeseri probably
> isn't of core concern, unless it's status in the wild makes it so.
> 
> Whaddya think?

Four sources? IDK what that means. 

There are, at present, probably a couple dozen or more folks keeping them.
The worry is: what if all tire of them simultaneously, which seems to happen
all too often. What safety net do we have? If wild collections are possible,
that's often a good one.

If Tom only came up with 4 people keeping them in the SMC report, it is
super panic time. We may not even get a very good genetic starting base.

Read Andrew's note that just passed across the list, and my response.

[BTW, I'll consider smuggling some eggs into NZ one of these days. Don't be
too public about that.]

I also think you should get in touch with Roger Langton, RWLACN at aol_com, and
see if he has any inputs to your activity. He is the past coordinator for
FP., and has been unavailable or unanswering to appeals from Art.

LMK what you think we should do.

Wright

-- 
Wright Huntley, Fremont CA, USA, 510 494-8679  huntley1 at home_com

       The internet has had no impact on my life @ all.
            'hAS ANYONE SEEN MY cAPSLOCK KEY?'
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Follow-Ups: References: