[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attachment
Jeremy Adams wrote:
>
> I thought it was a nice picture. I wish that it was not against the
> rules to post pics. If it were allowed, maybe more people would take
> them. I thought that they were filtered out somehow. Maybe this one
> slipped through.
>
> Does Richard's list allow pics?
I don't think there's a competent list on earth that "allows" pictures or
other binary-encoded files. Mail lists are designed to work well with *any*
operating system, but attachments give many of the dumb "Eunuchs" servers
fits (among other problems).
Just use a web page for the pic (many here will let you use theirs, if you
ask nicely), and post the URL to the list. Most modern mail programs let you
go there by simply clicking on the address.
That way, you aren't wasting huge amounts of bandwidth to send it to those
who don't care to look at it.
That's my US$0.01... (Two cents Canadian ;-)).
Wright
--
Wright Huntley, Fremont CA, USA, 510 494-8679 huntleyone at home dot com
"DEMOCRACY" is two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch.
"LIBERTY" is a well-armed lamb denying enforcement of the vote.
*** http://www.self-gov.org/index.html ***
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Follow-Ups:
References: