[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new AKA roster
When I first joined the AKA 30 years ago (good grief), it was not uncommon
for the membership chmn. to watch how many members we lost and how many were
new. Seldom see that anymore. I'm with Bill, I would like to see a yearly
update and especially an e-list. Kent Carpenter
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Vannerson" <William_Vannerson at ama-assn_org>
To: <killietalk at aka_org>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: new AKA roster
> >>Would like to have your comments on a yearly roster as well as those of
anyone else who are interested.<<
>
> The current two year cycle was implemented based upon production costs.
Current PC database and printer technology have reduced costs from the early
days when typesetting was the norm. However, I suspect that typesetting
savings are still small when compared to postage expesses. My guess is that
it costs more to mail the roster than it does to produce it!
>
> I would also be in favor of an annual roster, even if it meant higher
dues. I would also be in favor of an electronic roster (that _whoosh_ sound
you heard was me ducking al of the misc. objecyts thrown my way after that
comment.) I personally like having all of my favorite contacts available to
me at my finger tips. Sigh....
>
> Bill Vannerson
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/william_vannerson
>
> ---------------
> See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
>
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Follow-Ups:
References: