[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Diapteron fulgens
gunnar asblom wrote:
>
> Uhlmann, Peter {POAB~Basel} wrote:
> >
> > Last year I got a strain of Diapteron fulgens "LEC 93/6". Later I was told
> > that D. fulgens was only found at locations 7 and 9 of the LEC collection.
> > (Loc. 6 is given for D. georgiae, but my fish are definitely fulgens.) I
> > tried to track back my fish but this attempt ended somewhere in Germany
> > without a clear result, except that it seems that this 'strain' is
> > registered in the DKG already for some years.
> > I would appreciate all information that might help me to solve the matter.
> > I actually wonder how far this D. fulgens LEC 93/6 'strain' is meanwhile
> > distributed?
> >
> > Finally, I wonder how I should 'handle' this strain in the future. Should I
> > give it further as 'aquarium strain', as 'LEC 93/6???', or just as 'LEC
> > 93/6' ?
> >
> > Peter
> I have fulgens LEC 93/6 and have done some investigations.
> LEC 93/6 have been distrebuted by the breeder who recived wild fish from
> the colectors see page 467 in the book Fasination Killifische
> cameronense.
> There is one more fish from the same collectiontrip we have problem with
> cameronensis LEC 93/20 is in the hobby distrebuted by Cerfontain,they
> should not bee in the hobby if we look at page 420 in the same book.
> Gunnar Aasblom.
Some more ideas about fulgens LEC 93/6.Have many fulgens 93/6 and 93/7
and many of the males does get their orange-white band in caudalfin wery
late,long after they sexout.And one more thing have anyone seen georgiae
LEC 93/6 in the hobby?
Gunnar Aasblom.
---------------
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe
Follow-Ups:
References: