[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re:OCR - 100% not even close
In a message dated 1/18/2000 11:33:01 AM, Je3 at aol_com writes:
<< I'd bet you'd be hard pressed to even get a good photocopy let alone a
copy good enough for an accurate OCR job.
Unless of course those documents are of pristine quality, which is doubtful.
It isn't quite that bad, at least on the 1967-1972 articles I've scanned.
That doesn't mean it's 100% but it is better than typing it over again.
See http://www.aka.org/AKA/subkillietalk.html to unsubscribe