[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Please forward to the group...
- To: twlsn at CLEMSON_EDU, mbarnett at mindspring_com, marcie at nafnetwork_com, gbin at zoo_ufl.edu, jbondhus at lkdllink_net, vbrach at juno_com, Rjga at aol_com, hellerAP at aol_com, roger at minnow_demon.co.uk, bbn at nfwf_org, nanf at actwin_com, normane at hevanet_com, l-page1 at uiuc_edu, Harold.J.Schmidt-1 at tc_umn.edu, fishes at kuhub_cc.ukans.edu, noturus at aol_com, jtolman at cei_org, vern at icanect_net, bvoiers at aol_com, jim_williams at nbs_gov, MDWfield at aol_com
- Subject: Please forward to the group...
- From: robertrice at juno_com (robert a rice)
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 00:53:27 PST
HERE IS MY 1ST DRAFT OF A POSITION PAPER ON COLLECTING AND KEEPING OF NATIVE SPECIES....PLEASE LOOK IT OVER AND ADD YOUR INPUT...I WILL FORWARD
THE FINAL VERSION TO ALL 50 STATES PLUS THE FEDERAL
AGENCIES...................
NANFA POSITION PAPER :
AMENDING STATE REGULATIONS TO GUARANTEE THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO
COLLECT AND KEEP NATIVE FISHES FOR THE HOME AQUARIUM.
Currently all across the continent 1,000's of individuals
are collecting , rearing and breeding native fishes in home
Aquariams. Their activities are usually shrouded in legal
ambiguity. In many cases the keeping of common fishes such
as darters and pygmy sunfishes is technically illegal. They
are illegal due to individual states regulators lack of
consideration of this common use of our fisheries resources.
While such cases seldom if ever result in individuals being
prosecuted the possibility does exist. NANFA ( North
American Fishes Association ) has become a clearing house
for individuals interested in keeping native fishes. Our
unique makeup of 1/3 fisheries personnel and 2/3 Aquarist
gives us a balanced perspective in the issue of fisheries
regulation. The purpose of this position paper is to spur
the individual state regulatory committees to adjust
existing regulations to address the collecting and rearing
of native fish for the home Aquarium. We do not seek
anything but reasonable and rational access to our fisheries
resources like sport fishermen enjoy.
First and foremost we are all aware that our fishes are a
renewable natural resource that we all have a share in.
NANFA is involved all across the country in stream
restoration, endangered species propagation and public
education. We in NANFA seek to conserve and learn about our
fishes within the framework of state regulations.
Unfortunately as has been stated before many of the
regulations do not have the Aquarist in mind when they were
developed. The Aquarist who keeps Native Fish is an
invaluable untapped resource to State agencies for the
following reasons.
1.) Aquarist typically deal in non game species. Their
expertise in raising and breeding such species makes them a
valuable untapped resource for fisheries personnel.
Propagation techniques developed by Aquarist in NANFA are
all ready being used by the states of Tennessee, Virginia,
and Oregon on threatened and endangered species.
2.) With sanctioned involvement of Aquarist public education
would increase. With the increased public education
involvement would also increase. For example NANFA has
several writers who typically write for Aquarium magazines
and expose 500,000 readers to native species and their care.
These are people who vote, pay taxes and were largely
ignorant of our native species.
3.) Aquarist spend over 1 billion dollars a year on their
hobby. It is reasonable that some of that money be spent on
local species via a collectors license or permit fee.
4.) With their backgrounds in domestic propagation Aquarist
would be excellent partners in stream restoration projects.
5.) There are more Aquarist in this country than hunters
and fisherman combined. Encouraging their involvement in
local species could only benefit those species.
6.) The danger of introduction of non indigenous species to
new watersheds is minimal when compared with the risk of
existing stocking programs, bait collections etc. With
existing laws you are in effect encouraging individuals to
kill fish while discouraging them from preserving them (
i.e. you can collect X amount to use as bait but can not
collect for the home aquarium ) such regulations are short
sighted. Who is more likely to introduce a new species to a
watershed the bait farm/ stocking program with 1,000,000
fish and a 3% species by product (i.e. unintended species
in the mix) or an Aquarist with a few dozen shiners or
darters ?
NANFA proposes a simple game species -non game species
system for Aquarist .This would be covered under a regular
fishing license or an additional collecting permit if that
is necessary. For example an individual could collect X
amount of non game species per day via seine net, dip net
or hook. It is simpler to just name the game species than to
name the non game species. In addition an individual can
collect via seine ,dipnet or hook X amount of under X size
game fish for home Aquarium use. Scientific permits have
proven to be an ineffective means of allowing non game
species collecting. By their very nature they are exclusive.
For example a housewife in Illinois is very unlikely to be
able to acquire a scientific collecting permit so she can
collect Darters. The paperwork involved in such permits
makes them unsuitable as a means to allow collecting for the
home aquarium. They also are a difficulty to fisheries
personell. They must evaluate on a case by case basis
instead of assuming a citizen as a worthy fisherman , the
scientific collecting permit takes a guilty until proven
innocent attitude. The paperwork for a scientific collecting
permit is just too formidable for the average citizen or
fisheries department to deal with on a large scale.
In conclusion we ask that you reevaluate existing
regulations and include the needs of the home aquarium
collector in your future plans. The home aquarium collector
is a valuable untapped resource that is worthy of serious
consideration when evaluating fisheries programs and user
needs.
Follow-Ups: